Blog

  • Anshuman Singh Rathore & Ors v Union & Ors.  2024

    Anshuman Singh Rathore & Ors v Union & Ors.  2024

    Anshuman Singh Rathore & Ors v Union & Ors.  2024 – A division comprising Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Subhash Vidyarthi  of Allahabad Highcourt has declared the UP Board of Madarsa Education Act 2004 as unconstitutional on 22 March 2024 .  Let’s dive into the realm of this case from view of both side 

    Parties to the Case

    Case :- WRIT – C No. – 6049 of 2023
    Petitioner :- Anshuman Singh Rathore
    Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Edu. New
    Delhi And 3 Others

    Facts of this case

    This petition challenged  the vires of the U.P. Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 (for short ‘the Madarsa Act’) on the ground that the same violates the principle of Secularism, which forms a part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India as well Articles 14,15 and 21-A of the same.  Petitioner further challenges Section 1(5) of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. (RTE )

    Grounds Of Challenge

    • Madarsa Act violates the principles of secularism, which forms a part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India; fails to provide quality compulsory education up to the age of 14 years/Class-VIII, as is mandatorily required to be provided under Article 21-A of the Constitution of India; and further fails toprovide universal and quality school education to all the children studying in madarsas, as is mandatorily required to be provided under article 21 of the Constitution of India. Thus it violates the Fundamental Rights of the students of the madarsas. The writ petition also challenges vires of Section 1(5) of the R.T.E. Act which excludes Madarsas, Vedic Pathshalas and educational institutions primarily imparting religious instructions.
    • The provisions of Madarsa Act making special provisions for education to the children of a single minority community, in a very limited sphere of knowledge and of level lower than the normal level of education imparted in regular educational institutions, is clearly violative of the fundamental duties and, therefore, the Madarsa Act is violative of the basic spirit of the Constitution of India.
    • Section 9(a) and 9(j) of Madarsa Act contain Provisions regarding determination of standards of higher education in Madarsa, power that vests in the Central Government, as per entry 66 of List I of Constitution, and, therefore, the State does not have the legislative competence to legislate in this regard.
    • Madarsa Act Violates Secularism and Article 14, 15, 16(5), 29(2), 30 and Article 51-A of the Constitution of India.
    • Madarsa Act is directly in conflict with and violates the U.G.C. Act and entrenches upon the field occupied by the central legislation and thus to the said extent is also ultravires.

    Submission of Respondents

    • Madarsa Board is providing religious education as well as religious Instructions to the students and  the State has sufficient power to impart such education under the Constitution of India and is rightly permitting such education.
    • Education provided by Madarsa Board is traditional education, relating to religion, culture and language which does not change with time. It is covered by entry 25 of List III of VII schedule to the Constitution of India.
    • The U.G.C. Act does not relate to religious teachings, education and instructions or with traditional education and thus both occupy different fields.
    • Articles 25 to 30 of the Constitution of India says  that religious education and instructions of a religion can be provided in schools and thus State Government can frame such an Act.

    Court’s Ruling

    • Education under the Madarsa Act is certainly not equivalent to the education being imparted to the students of other regular educational institutions recognized by the State Primary and High School and Intermediate boards and, therefore, the educations being imparted in Madarsas is neither ‘quality’ nor ‘universal’ in nature.
    • The students of all other religions are getting educated in all modern subject denial of the same quality by the Madarsa Board amounts to violation of both Article 21-A as well as Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The State cannot hide behind the lame excuse that it is fulfilling its duty by providing traditional education on nominal fee.
    • Madarsa Act, 2004, is violative of the principle of Secularism, which is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 21-A of the Constitution of India and violative of Section 22 of the university Grants Commission Act, 1956. Accordingly, the Madarsa Act 2004 is declared unconstitutional.
    • State Government is directed to take steps forthwith for accommodating these Madarsa students in regular schools recognized under the Primary Education Board and schools recognized under the high School and Intermediate Education Board of State of U.P.

    Related Post | Anshuman Singh Rathore & Ors v Union & Ors.  2024

    Sources | Anshuman Singh Rathore & Ors v Union & Ors.  2024

  • Concept of Culture in Sociology | Meaning | Definition | Characteristics

    Concept of Culture in Sociology | Meaning | Definition | Characteristics

    Culture is one of the most important concepts in social science. Commonly used in psychology, political science, and economics. It is a key concept in anthropology and a fundamental concept in sociology. The study of human society leads us directly and inevitably to the study of its culture. The study of a society or any aspect of it will be incomplete without a proper understanding of that society’s culture. Culture and society are one in the same. They are inseparable.

    Culture is unique to humans

    Culture is a uniquely human property. It is one of the characteristics of human society. Culture does not exist at a subhuman level. Only humans are born and raised in a cultural environment. Other animals also live in their natural environment. To say that “all people are born into a society” is the same as saying that all people are born into a culture.

    Therefore, the proverb Man is a social being'' can be redefined as Man is a cultural being.” Every person can be seen as a representative of their culture. Culture is the unique quality that distinguishes humans from lower animals. Culture is a very broad term that includes all areas of our life, behavior, philosophy and ethics, morals and manners, customs and traditions, religion, politics, economics, and other types of activity. Culture includes everything that people have acquired in their personal and social lives. In the words of McVar and Page, culture is “a realm of styles, values, emotional attachments, and intellectual adventures.” It is the totality of the “social heritage” that individuals receive from the group.

    what is not culture

    The word “culture” has various meanings and interpretations. Some of them are purely anti-social, if not outright wrong. Culture is often used as a synonym for education. Therefore, they use the term “cultural” to refer to an educated person or group, and the term “uncivilized” to refer to a person lacking or lacking in education.

    The difference between educated people and uneducated people may also be related to personal sophistication. Possessing this trait indicates that a person knows how to behave in all social situations that they may encounter. The person or culture has good manners and good taste. Additionally, there may be a tendency to believe that a Bachelor of Arts degree has a “better” culture than other degrees. “Culture” in sociology does not mean personal sophistication. The sociological meaning of this word is completely different.

    Historians use the word “culture” in a different sense to refer to collective life and the so-called “higher” achievements of a historical period. “Higher” achievements are understood to mean achievements in art, music, literature, philosophy, religion, and science.

    Therefore, the cultural history of India would be an explanation of the historical achievements in these regions. The adjective “cultural” would distinguish this type of history from political history, industrial history, military history, etc. Again, sociologists never use the term culture in the sense of the so-called “higher” fruits of collective life, namely the arts. religion, philosophy, etc. Culture refers to “all” the fruits of collective life. Furthermore, culture and nationality are not necessarily synonymous.

    However, in the modern world, nation-states have become the most powerful centripetal force in social organization. Social scientists treat modern nations as if they were cultural entities. But in reality, people of the same nationality can have different cultural characteristics, as is the case in India.

    Definitions of culture

    1. B. Malinowski has defined culture as the ‘cumulative creation of man’. He also culture is the handiwork of man and the medium through which he achieves his ends.
    2. Graham Wallas, an English sociologist has defined culture as an accumulation of thoughts, values and objects; it is the social heritage acquired by us from preceding generations through learning, as distinguished from the biological heritage which is passed on to us automatically through the genes.
    3. C.C. North is of the opinion that culture ‘consists in the instruments constituted by man to assist him in satisfying his wants.’
    4. Edwurd B. Tvlor, a famous English anthropologist, has defined culture as ‘that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society’. Tylor’s definition is widely quoted and used today.
    5. Robert Bierstedt is of the opinion that ‘culture is the complex whole that consists of all the ways we think and do everything we have as members of society’.
    6. E.V. de Roberty regards culture as ‘the body of thoughts and knowledge, both theoretical and practical, which only man can possess.’

    Characteristics of Culture

    The definitions cited above reveal several characteristics of culture. To clearly understand the concept of culture, it is necessary to know its basic characteristics.

    Culture is something you learn

    Culture is not biologically inherited, but is socially learned by people. It’s not an innate tendency. No such cultural instinct exists. Culture is often referred to as “learned behavior.” Unlearned behaviors such as eye closure during sleep and the blink reflex are purely physiological in nature and are not culturally determined. On the other hand, shaking hands, saying ‘namaskar’ or ‘thank you’, shaving and changing clothes are cultural. Similarly, getting dressed, combing your hair, wearing jewelry, cooking, drinking from a glass, eating from a plate or from a leaf, reading a newspaper, driving a car, etc. Examples include acting out a role in a drama, singing, and worship. All the behaviors that humans have learned culturally.

    Culture is social Culture

    does not exist in isolation. Nor is it an isolated phenomenon. It is a product of society. It arises and develops through social interaction. It is also shared by working people. No one can acquire culture without contact with others. Humans only become human within humans. It is a culture that helps humans develop human qualities in a human environment. The deprivation of society, or the deprivation of relationships with others and individuals, is nothing but the deprivation of human qualities.

    Culture is shared

    Culture in the sociological sense is general. It is not something that can be owned by individuals alone. For example, customs, traditions, beliefs, ways of thinking, values, and morals are shared by people in a group or society. Arya Bhatta and Albert Einstein’s invention, “Charaka”

    Charles Darwin; Literary works of Kalidasa, Keats, Dandy and Dante. The philosophical works of Confucius, Laozi, Shankaracharya, and Swami Vivekananda. All the artworks of Ravi Verma and Raphacl are shared by many people. “Culture is something adopted, used, believed, practiced, or possessed by a plurality of people.” Its existence depends on collective living. (Robert Bierstedt).

    Culture is Transmissive

    Culture can be passed down from generation to generation. Parents pass on cultural traits to their children, who in turn pass them on to their children. Culture is transmitted through language, not genes. Language is the most important medium of culture. Language in its various forms, such as reading, writing, and speaking, allows the current generation to understand the achievements of previous generations. But language itself is part of culture. As soon as a language is acquired, it develops a wide field for the individual. Cultural transmission occurs through both imitation and instruction.

    Culture is continuous and cumulative

    Culture exists as a continuous process. It tends to be cumulative in historical growth. Culture is a “growing whole” that combines past and present achievements and provides provision for humanity’s future achievements. “Culture can therefore be imagined as a kind of flow that flows from generation to generation over centuries.” Some sociologists, such as Linton, therefore called culture the “social heritage” of humanity. As Robert Bierstedt writes, culture is “the memory of humanity.” It is difficult to imagine what society would be like without this cultural accumulation, and what our lives would be like without it.

    Culture is consistent and integrated

    In its development, culture shows a tendency towards consistency. At the same time, different parts of culture are interconnected. For example, a society’s value system is closely related to other aspects such as morality, religion, customs, traditions, and beliefs.

    Culture is dynamic and adaptable

    Cultures are relatively stable, but not completely static. Change is always possible, albeit slowly. Culture has the potential for change and growth. If we compare modern Indian culture with that of the Vedic period, we find that it has undergone remarkable development. Therefore, culture is dynamic. Culture responds to changing conditions in the physical world. Adaptable. They also intervene in the natural environment and support human adaptation processes. Just as our homes protect us from storms, our culture also protects us from natural disasters and helps us survive. In fact, very few people can live without culture.

    Culture is fun

    Culture provides appropriate opportunities and prescribes the means to meet our needs and desires. These needs can be biological or social. For example, our needs for food, clothing, shelter, status, fame, prestige, money, friends, etc. are all satisfied according to cultural customs. Culture determines and guides a variety of human activities. In fact, culture is defined as the process by which people meet their needs.

    Culture differs from society to society

    Every society has its own culture. It varies from society to society. The culture of every society is unique. Culture is not homogeneous. Cultural elements such as customs, traditions, morals, ideals, values, ideologies, beliefs, practices, philosophies, and institutions are not uniform everywhere. Societies vary greatly in how they eat, speak, greet, dress, entertain, and live their lives. Culture also changes over time. No culture ever remains constant or unchanging. If Manu were to come back to learn about today’s Indian society, he would be amazed to see the tremendous changes that are taking place in our culture.

    what a culture contents ?

    Every society has its own culture. Therefore, people in different societies around the world have different cultures. These cultures are not only diverse but also unequal. In addition to the cultural differences and inequalities found in societies around the world, we also observe certain cultural similarities. People may worship different gods in different ways, but all have religions.

    They all have different jobs, but they all make a living. Although the contents of rituals, rituals, and customs vary, every country has some kind of rituals, rituals, and customs. All cultures are made up of these intangible things. Similarly, people in any society possess different kinds of materials, and these materials can be primitive or modern, simple or complex in nature. There may be cases. These tangible and intangible components of culture are often referred to as “cultural content.”

    Many sociologists classify the content of culture into broad components: “material culture” and “non-material culture.” Ogburn even used this distinction as the basis for his theory of cultural change. As Robert Bierstedt has pointed out, the concept of “material culture” is relatively precise and less ambiguous. However, the concept of intangible culture is even more vague and unclear. This is used as the “residual category” and means “everything that is not material.”

    Material and Non-Material Culture

    (i) Material culture

    Material culture consists of tools, equipment, furniture, man-made objects such as cars, buildings, dams, roads, bridges, and indeed physical materials that have been modified and used by humans. This relates to exterior products, mechanical products, and daily necessities. This includes technical and material equipment such as printing presses, locomotives, telephones, televisions, tractors, machine guns, etc. This includes banks, parliaments, insurance systems, monetary systems, etc. This is called civilization.

    (ii) Non-Material Culture

    “Culture” in the usual sense means “Non-Material Culture.” It is something internal and intrinsically valuable that reflects a person’s inner nature. Intangible culture consists of the words and languages ​​that people use, the beliefs that people hold, the values ​​and virtues that people cherish, the customs that people follow, the rituals and practices that people practice, and the rituals that people follow. This includes our habits, preferences, attitudes and views – how we act, feel and think.

    Related Post

    what is culture ?

    culture as an accumulation of thoughts, values and objects; it is the social heritage acquired by us from preceding generations through learning, as distinguished from the biological heritage which is passed on to us automatically through the genes.

    what is Material culture ?

    Material culture consists of tools, equipment, furniture, man-made objects such as cars, buildings, dams, roads, bridges, and indeed physical materials that have been modified and used by humans. This relates to exterior products, mechanical products, and daily necessities.

    what is Non-Material Culture ?

    It is something internal and intrinsically valuable that reflects a person’s inner nature. Intangible culture consists of the words and languages ​​that people use, the beliefs that people hold, the values ​​and virtues that people cherish, the customs that people follow, the rituals and practices that people practice, and the rituals that people follow. This includes our habits, preferences, attitudes and views – how we act, feel and think.

    Reference Books

    • Social Change in Modern India by M N Srinivas
    • Sociological Theory by George Ritzer
    • C.N. Shankar Rao – Principle of sociology with an introduction to social thoughts
    • A Dictionary of Sociology by John Scott
    • Handbook of Indian Sociology by Veena Das
    • Introduction to Sociology by Anthony Giddens

    Sources

  • Subject Matter of sociology

    Subject Matter of sociology

    Subject Matter of sociology – Main Concerns of Sociology (Subjects of Sociology) Since the dawn of sociology, sociologists have placed great emphasis on human-society dynamics. The focus wavered between man and society. “sometimes Sometimes the emphasis was on people in society, other times it was on people in society. But at no point in its development has man as an individual been the center of attention.

    On the contrary, sociology focused on society and its major units and dynamics. We aim to analyze social dynamics in terms of organized patterns of social relations. Sociology next says that he seeks clarification of three basic questions. How and why do societies arise? How and why do societies endure? Why and how do societies change?

    A comprehensive and expanding science like sociology is undoubtedly growing rapidly. It is not surprising that sociologists have developed different approaches from time to time to enrich their research. Nevertheless, it is possible to identify some issues that are the subject of sociology and on which there is little disagreement among sociologists. Such issues and areas broadly constitute the field of sociology.

    A general overview of the areas of sociology for which there is widespread agreement among sociologists can be given here.

    First, the main concern of sociology is sociological analysis. This means that sociologists try to analyze human society and culture from a sociological perspective. He is concerned with the development of society and seeks to reconstruct the major stages of the evolutionary process. He also attempts to “analyze the factors and forces underlying the historical transformation of society.” Sociological analysis emphasizes the scientific method.

    Second, sociology has paid due attention to the study of the major units of social life. This field concerns social behavior and relationships, individual identities, groups of all kinds, communities (urban, rural, tribal), associations, organizations and populations.

    Third, sociology studies the development of various basic social institutions, such as family and kinship, religion and property, economics, politics, law, education and science, leisure and welfare institutions, aesthetic and expressive institutions, dealt with structure and function.

    Fourth, sociologists cannot afford to ignore fundamental social processes that play an important role. Social processes such as cooperation and competition, adaptation and assimilation, social conflict including war and revolution. Communication, including the formation, expression and modification of opinions. Social differentiation and stratification, socialization and indoctrination, social control and deviance, including crime, suicide, social integration and social change occupy an important position in sociological research.

    Fifth, sociology has also placed great emphasis on research methods. contemporary sociology tends to be rational and empirical rather than philosophical idealistic. Sociologists have attempted to apply the scientific method to social research. As Natural scientists, sociologists, feel the problems that need to be investigated. Then he tries to formulate it into one Proposals that can be researched. After collecting data, he attempts a connection between them. He eventually arrives at meaningful concepts, statements and generalizations.

    Sixth, sociologists are interested in the task of “formulating concepts, propositions, and theories.” “Concepts are abstracted from concrete experience to represent classes of phenomena” concept. The proposals “seek to reflect the relationships between different categories of data or concepts.” For example, “lower-class youth are more likely to commit crimes than middle-class youth.” This proposal is controversial. It may turn out to be wrong.

    To give another example, “Taking advantage of opportunities for higher education and professional mobility leads to the weakening of kinship ties and territorial loyalties.” Sounds good, but a closer look confirms it. Query and collect relevant data. Theory goes beyond concepts and statements. “A theory is a systematically coherent description that explains social phenomena.” Sociological theory is primarily factual, not philosophical. A sociological perspective becomes more meaningful and fruitful when you try it.

    Acquire knowledge from concepts, descriptions, and theories. Finally, in this age of knowledge explosion, sociologists have also tried to specialize. Thus, many specialized research areas have emerged today. The sociology of knowledge, the sociology of history, the sociology of literature, the sociology of culture, the sociology of religion, the sociology of the family, etc. constitute such specialties, and because the field of study of sociology is so vast, Every student who studies is endowed with talent and a wealth of knowledge. The sociological imagination can bring a new dimension to sociology as a whole.

    Related Post | Subject Matter of sociology

    Reference Books | Subject Matter of sociology

    • Handbook of Indian Sociology by Veena Das
    • C.N. Shankar Rao – Principle of sociology with an introduction to social thoughts
    • Introduction to Sociology by Anthony Giddens
    • A Dictionary of Sociology by John Scott
    • Sociological Theory by George Ritzer
    • Social Change in Modern India by M N Srinivas

    Sources | Subject Matter of sociology

  • Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

    Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

    Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology – There are two ways for individuals to gain status in society: by ascription or achievement. Some statuses are unavoidable for individuals, while others are more or less freely chosen by individuals. Linton uses the concepts of “ascription” and “achievement” to describe this status distinction. Some statuses are “achievement” to individuals, while other statuses are achieved by individuals.

    In some societies, there may be more status conferred than achieved, and vice versa in others. But strictly speaking, all societies use both the principle of belonging and the principle of achievement to guarantee the status of their members.

    1. Ascribed Status | Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

    An ascribed status is one over which the individual has no choice. These arise from membership in involuntary groups, such as gender groups, age groups, or racial groups. Newborns acquire such status during the early stages of socialization itself. In reality, these statuses are assigned to individuals before they know their potential. These statuses “clearly determine and limit the range of statuses” that he can later achieve or seek to achieve.

    Status is typically ascribed based on the following considerations:

    1. Sex

    An individual’s gender is a clearly visible physiological fact. It appears at birth and persists throughout life. A person is born male or female and remains male throughout life. This gender difference is considered one of the basis for the ascription of personal status. Part of the status achieved is influenced by this gender factor. It is a mistake to think that the division of status between men and women is primarily based on the inherent characteristics of men and women. This is because biological characteristics cannot explain the differences in behavior between men and women.

    Furthermore, social differences themselves are not fixed, but change from society to society and from era to era. Example: In the Chamburi tribe, women are the breadwinners, but men are responsible for the household chores and spend their time combing their hair, wearing different types of beads, and other types of decorations.

    Among the Mundugumor, females and males are equally aggressive. Among the Trobriand Islanders, except for breastfeeding, all other childcare duties are performed by the father. In some tribes, fathers teach their sons the art of dancing. These differences cannot be explained by biological properties themselves.

    In today’s complex society, the status given to women has changed significantly. There is still a certain division of roles between men and women. Today, women are not excluded from professional life, but they are at a disadvantage when competing with men in certain fields, such as medicine. Law, university teaching, factory work, defense, industry, etc. Indeed, it is excluded from operations such as coal mining, steel construction, and undersea tunneling. For women, this means that their assigned status limits their ability to achieve the status they achieve.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    2. Age

    All societies recognize age-related differences in status and roles. Like sex, it is a clear and clearly visible physiological fact. Unlike gender, age does not lead to permanent status over a lifetime. Age is not a fixed thing, it is always changing, and age relationships between certain people, such as father and son, younger brother and older brother, are fixed throughout life. However, all living people are exposed to various aging conditions throughout their lives.

    Most societies recognize five major age states: infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age. In some societies, the unborn and the dead are also considered two special ages, each with their own meaning. It is believed that fetuses are the spirits of deceased ancestors. Hindus vaguely think of fetuses as spirits of the “souls” of people who lived in previous lives, or “jammas.”

    In settled cultures, personal power and prestige typically increases with age. The old is trying to retain its former power. We can also expect them to play an active role in society, especially for political and administrative purposes. They can stay in power. For an advantage based on knowledge and experience. Young people may appreciate or even envy this advantage. This advantage is firmly established in organizational societies through the ascription of status based on age. Social status is given not only to living individuals but also to those who have passed away. (Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    The main reason is that the living are descendants of the dead, both physically and socially. The practice of ancestor worship shows a clear recognition of the status of the dead. Hindus have a Shraddha ritual where they offer sacrifices to the dead. In some societies, great people are remembered for their deeds. In this case, the status would indicate the achieved status. ”

    Finally, as Ralph Linton pointed out, “Biological factors play a role in age, just as they do in gender.” Related people appear to be secondary to cultural people in determining the content of status.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    3. Kinship

    Kinship status provides information about a person’s relationship with their parents and siblings. A newborn’s status in the community is usually equated with that of its parents. This attribution is highly arbitrary, as there is no necessary connection between the parents’ abilities and the children’s abilities. Smart children can be born to stupid parents, and vice versa. Still, it is socially rational to connect children to society through their parents. When a child is born, the father and mother are responsible. They socialize him only in the early stages. It is only natural that a child’s first social relationship is with their parents.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Much of a significant child’s status depends on kinship factors. For example, the attribution of citizenship, religious affiliation, and community affiliation is almost always a matter of identification with one’s parents. Class or caste status is passed down from parents to children.

    Through kinship, children not only acquire social status but also status within the family. The child acquires the status of son or daughter. To the parents’ relatives, he may be a grandson, nephew, brother, cousin, or son. Kinship involves mutual rights and obligations. Even in modern society, kinship relationships remain socially important, even if kinship relationships have not expanded. In some societies, much of social life is determined by them.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Other grounds for Ascription

    In addition to age, gender, and kinship, there are other grounds for ascribing status. Because an individual already has certain racial characteristics at birth, a racial status can be assigned to that person. Individuals have no choice about their place of birth and are therefore assigned regional and national status. These can be changed later, but there is no initial selection.

    Similarly, our religious status is assigned at birth, so we are born as Hindus, Christians, Muslims, etc. However, you can also obtain another religious status later. Our original class status also plays a role. At birth, we assume the class position of our parents because we have no choice. However, you can change it later. However, the caste status assigned at birth cannot be changed.

    For example, illegitimacy prevents full identification with parents. Similarly, the total number of children born in the family, the fact of adoption, the death of parents, the occurrence of divorce can affect the status of a child, regardless of his will. Therefore, “accidents of birth” are universal and extremely important in society.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    2.The Achieved Status | Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

    The status a person can choose is any achieved status, no matter how big or small. Every society has a certain achieved status, and no society is completely dependent on the status it has been given. The proportion of positions that lead to success in social structures varies widely around the world.

    Even if a society takes great care in assigning certain positions to its members, some people may change their assigned positions within an organization because of particular talents or ambitions. The history of all societies and eras is full of their names. Because they are the ones who make history. In order to use their abilities for society’s common purposes, society institutionalizes the acquisition of status. In this way, society can capitalize on deviance rather than punishing it.

    Furthermore, by legitimizing certain status changes, societies can accommodate members with unusual abilities for statuses for which average abilities are inadequate. It can also prevent some incompetent people from reaching high positions. Leaders of combat units, creators of works of art, and inventors are examples of positions where society might reward merit rather than ascribing a minority status based on birth.

    In modern civilized society, most professional positions have been achieved. The presence of many secondary groups indicates that our organizational membership has achieved status. Marital status, parental status, educational status, etc. are all accomplished. Because you have no obligation to be a husband, wife, parent, or an educated person. The great function of a social structure with many achieved statuses is not to ensure the isolation of roles, but rather to link them into necessary interdependencies. Structures characterized by achieved statuses increase competition for those statuses, but role specialization also requires cooperation.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Relationship between ascribed and achieved status

    Ascription and achievement of statuses are closely related in any society. Although they are contradictory in principle, they are indispensable to society because they complement each other functionally. For the purpose of socialization, that is, the introduction of an individual into the culture of a group, the person must be placed somewhere in the social structure at birth.

    This initial placement or ascription may be a matter of purely arbitrary social rules based on some external factors. However, the individual’s achievements must be recognized later. That’s quite an accomplishment. His initial placement itself may have influenced his achievements .

    Even if you achieve all the stats, some stats may not be filled. If all status were ascribed, there would be little room for human creativity and talent. Ascribed status conveys a sense of security that purely achieved status can never convey. We cannot expose our entire lives to competition. You don’t have to face a life where everyone around you is a potential competitor for all the fame and fame you can achieve. On the one hand, the value of the achieved status lies in the fact that it not only puts the right people in the right place, but also stimulates effort and success.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Ascribed status is a set of achieved statuses. You can compete for some of them, but you don’t have to compete for all of them. A man’s ascribed status frees him from competition for various positions, such as hospital nurse, kindergarten teacher, babysitter, etc. The ascribed status of old age frees one from the competition for status that comes with youth.

    Therefore, Ascription can to some extent relieve the pressure on free choice. Achieved status gives individuals a certain degree of freedom to choose their favorite job and perform it well, but by motivating people to pursue status and ultimately perform their duties, It also contributes to the survival of social structures.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Note that societies vary widely in terms of status. For example, in medieval society, religious status, class status, and even professional status were ascribed. They could not be reached. In totalitarian societies, even in the 20th century, political status was usually ascribed. In some societies, the occupational status of all members varies according to age, gender, and kinship.

    In caste societies like India, caste status is determined by kinship. However, in more “liquid” societies with class structures, class status is usually achieved. In “free societies” where there are a large number of voluntary associations, the status achieved is greatest.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Related Post | Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

    Ascribed Status means ?

    An ascribed status is one over which the individual has no choice. These arise from membership in involuntary groups, such as gender groups, age groups, or racial groups. Newborns acquire such status during the early stages of socialization itself.

    Achieved Status means ?

    The status a person can choose is any achieved status, no matter how big or small. Every society has a certain achieved status, and no society is completely dependent on the status it has been given. The proportion of positions that lead to success in social structures varies widely around the world.(Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology)

    Reference Books | Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

    • C.N. Shankar Rao – Principle of sociology with an introduction to social thoughts
    • Social Change in Modern India by M N Srinivas
    • A Dictionary of Sociology by John Scott
    • Introduction to Sociology by Anthony Giddens
    • Handbook of Indian Sociology by Veena Das
    • Sociological Theory by George Ritzer

    Sources | Ascribed And Achieved Statuses in Sociology

  • Farmers Protest 2.0 & MSP Concept

    Farmers Protest 2.0 & MSP Concept

    Farmers Protest 2.0 – Farmers from Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, & Haryana, with over 200 unions, organised a march, ‘Delhi Chalo’, to voice their demands. This resulted in chaos when police fired tear gas & water cannons to stop them from entering Delhi.

    “Major Demands of Farmers”

    • Legal guarantee for MSP for all crops
    • Farm loan waivers
    • Implementation of the Swaminathan Commission recommendations Pensions for farmers & farm labourers
    • Withdrawal of cases against farmers during the 2020 protest

    “Swaminathan Commission Recommendations”

    • Increasing the MSP for crops by at least 50% more than the cost of production.
    • Setting up a mechanism to regulate the sale of agricultural land.
    • Reduction in the crop loan rate to 4%, with govt support to improve farmers’ credit availability.
    • Increasing investments in agriculture-related infrastructure to enhance productivity.

    “MSP: What is it ?”

    One of the main demands of the farmers’ unions, the Minimum Support Price is a type of market intervention by the government to protect farmers against any significant decline in farm prices. It was one of the major agricultural reforms implemented in post-independence India.

    At the start of the planting season for some crops, the government announces the minimum support prices based on the recommendations made by the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP).

    “MSP From a Historical Angle”

    • It is commonly known that the leaders of both the previous and current protests are members of the large farmer class that emerged in northwest India during the Green Revolution. This class was created because of government assistance provided through subsidies, MSPs, free electricity, water, and credit, among other initiatives.
    • This class of farmers also developed interests in trade and business, as well as moneylending. This class perceived a threat from the entry of the agri-business enterprises with the passing of the New Farm Laws, which have subsequently been withdrawn.
    • 86% of farmers in the nation are small and marginal growers that purchase food grains on a net basis. By forcing the State to buy at MSP to maintain artificially high prices, these farmers suffer from inflation.

    “What the Institution of MSP has led to:”

    1. have exacerbated Punjab’s uneven cropping patterns,
      destroyed biodiversity, and created ecological and environmental issues by lowering water levels,
      which has resulted in soil degradation.
    2. The whole of northern India is covered with smog.
    3. Price guarantee for rice when buying from MSP caused the Punjab’s desert (dry) region to begin growing rice.
    4. “Country’s Refusal to Accept The True Nature of Agriculture :”

    Sadly, since our independence, various governments have consistently failed to see farming as an individual business, and farmers as individual producers. It’s not the government’s role to guarantee set prices or earnings or favor certain producer groups.

    Sadly, our nation has stuck with flawed farming policies for far too long, creating an entirely skewed market where just a few middlemen thrive. Legislating MSP as a legal right and criminalising commercial deals, some believe, would be a step backwards.

    There’s no fault in an ordinary farmer seeking a better price for his products. Still, legal backing to MSP, controlling the cost of farm goods, could spell disaster for the farming sector, some suggest.

    “A Fundamental Role of Economics”


    A core principle in the field of economics states that whenever a minimum price level is established, a surplus production situation is inevitable. This concept is exactly what the Minimum Support Price (MSP) aims to address. Each year, the surplus wheat and rice output is acquired at the MSP rate.

    The certainty of pricing provided by these guaranteed prices significantly influences farmers’ decisions on what crops to grow. Nonetheless, due to budgetary and logistical limitations, only a small portion of the total yield, benefiting a mere 6% of farmers, particularly in Punjab and Haryana, is reported to be purchased effectively.

    “What Happens if the Government Purchases All Crops?”

    1. If the Government chooses to purchase all the crops requested by the protesters.
    2. There will be difficulties regarding their storage, and;
    3. If MSP is made mandatory, there will be difficulties regarding the quality of the crop, as the government will have to decide:
    4. Which quality will be procured at MSP, and;
    5. What will be the rate for the poor quality, and who will buy it.
    6. Even with the current restricted buying, FCI still has an enormous excess of coarse grains. With funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, Intelle-cap, a consultancy, conducted a study which revealed that:

    Crop post-harvest losses are projected to be around Rs 92,600 crore per year, with post-harvest losses in cereals like wheat and rice ranging from 3.9% to 6%.

    The study claims that the losses are caused by rotting, leaks, and rodents consuming everything because of improper storage. Additionally, the accumulation of extra inventory has increased the cost of financing, storage, and other logistics.

    As a result, the FCI (the food corporation of India) is forced to regularly sell the excess grains on the open market, frequently for a price that is far less than the procurement cost, causing massive losses to FCI.

    Related Post

    Sources

  • MLA candidacy not fundamental right so no direct appeal : Supreme Court

    MLA candidacy not fundamental right so no direct appeal : Supreme Court

    MLA candidacy not fundamental right so no direct appeal – In the case, Chaitanya Sharma and ors vs Speaker Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly and ors, a petition was filed before the Top Court by six Congress legislators from Himachal Pradesh who were disqualified by the speaker of the assembly.

    Speaker disqualified the MLAs for having remained absent from the House despite the issuance of a whip by the party.The speaker had opined that in voting on critical matters like budget, elected MLAs of a party cannot be permitted to hide behind procedural technicalities such as proof of service of the whip. Thus, the speaker had ruled that the six MLAs incurred disqualification under the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution.

    The Supreme Court said that a petition can be filed directly before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution only when there is a violation of any of the fundamental rights enumerated in Part III of the Constitution.

    The Supreme Court asked at the outset why the petitioners had notmoved the High Court first and what fundamental rights’ violation was involved in the matter. They were elected as per the provisions of the Constitution but that is not a fundamental right.

    Related Post | MLA candidacy not fundamental right so no direct appeal

    Sources | MLA candidacy not fundamental right so no direct appeal